Notes
- historic ruling by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin that the stop-and-frisk practices of the New York Police Department violate the Constitution is being applauded as a major victory against unreasonable policing.
- “This is a very dangerous decision made by a judge who I think does not understand how policing works,”
- the Supreme Court has given police officers to target African-Americans and Latinos with little or no basis.
- Despite the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, the Supreme Court’s interpretation of that provision gives the police frighteningly wide discretion to follow, stop, question, frisk and employ excessive force against African-Americans and Latinos who have shown virtually no indication of wrongdoing.
- Officer can follow someone without any hint that they had done anything wrong.
- If someone were a Latino, the Officer could argue that they “looked Mexican,” and therefore believed that they were undocumented.
No comments:
Post a Comment